John Dunn

The idolatry of death A bogus reality

Thursday, 12 October 2023 at 20:54

The idolatry of death
A bogus reality

When all is reduced to its absolute limit of reduction, i.e. the reduction of the religionists, the supposed nought (0) before the supposed one-off beginning, or the supposed nought (0) before the so-called big bang, then we are dealing with a nought (0) that is one and all. 0 = 1.

With the beginning the infinite space of nothing was bounded. To be bounded it had to become observed and known, but perhaps that is simply to objectify it, make of it an abstraction. The Beginning is now in living thinking, or it is nothing, an abstraction. The concrete actuality of anything can only exist now, in the Creation, in the Beginning , always.

As such, the concrete reality of the oneness of nothing can only exist now as created now in the eternity of the present, behind which there is nopast and in front of which there is no future. All past, present and future is now in living thinking.

The darkness of nothing that is death, as preserved by the Prince of Darkness and his followers, is uncovered for what it is, a pre-existent ‘reality’, a bogus reality, a presupposition, an idol to worship.

© John Dunn.

Perpetual Beginning

Wednesday, 11 October 2023 at 20:16

Perpetual Beginning
There is no progression

In unbounded nothingness all is one, all is subsumed in one. What is all? All is one. There is only one and 1 = 0. How do we get from no-thing to some-thing? (How do we get from something to someone?)

In the Beginning is Mind. Before the Beginning there was nothing and 0 = 1. With the Beginning the infinite space of nothing was bounded. For the one has no past but is created in the eternity of the present, behind which there is no past and in front of which there is no future. There is only Beginning, perpetual Beginning.

I so want to say “Becoming”, but “perpetual Beginning” better captures the essence of the eternal moment that is devoid of chronology. There is no becoming, there is no progression.

© John Dunn.

THE BEGINNING

Sunday, 8 October 2023 at 19:50

Before and after part 2

THE BEGINNING

We need to allow for spiritual receptiveness without individual enclosure.

I am constantly given to myself in a stream of ideas which come to my mind more or less unexpectedly, bringing me a light whose nature I cannot forebode and of which I become aware at a later stage.

The origin of this stream of ideas transcends my person and resolves itself in the reality of the whole.

My current thinking is the thinking of reality inside me. The reality and I coincide in a single centrality.

© John Dunn.

BEFORE THE BEGINNING

Sunday, 8 October 2023 at 19:48

Before and after part 1

BEFORE THE BEGINNING

This is the origin of the crisis of the modern man.

It is caused by the inability of looking outside ourselves for the source of our current consciousness and thinking.

We are incapable of believing in an other as absolute, of having faith in the idea.

The crisis lies in the hypostasis of the person, in egocentrism and egoism:becoming inward-looking, loving only ourselves directly and being miserable due to the awareness of our limitedness.

We believe our thoughts are our own, garnered from the ready-made world outside, and locked inside our brains, where eventually they perish.

© John Dunn.

Pinnacle of sinfulness

Sunday, 8 October 2023 at 19:33

Pinnacle of sinfulness

We cannot speak of any reality that is not in the living thinking of our current consciousness. This excludes the thoughts that differ from our current one.

To presuppose or believe in a reality outside of current consciousness is to repeat original sin.

This places God above, as understood by believers, at the pinnacle of sinfulness.

© John Dunn.

The origin story

Saturday, 7 October 2023 at 21:50

The origin story

All origin stories need a mythology, because there is no other way of explaining the inexplicable. 



The origin of being needs an intervention into the state of non-being. It is in the intervention that the mystery lies, because it will not be explained. That which will not be explained needs myth in order that we may at least grasp at the principle of being’s origin by some means. The critical turn comes when it is realised that the cosmic origin story serves to explicate the personal origin story. Once the transition is made, truth is no longer distant and abstract, but immanent and real.

How shall this infinite oneness of nothing be expressed, this unchanging equilibrium that lasted from for ever, until the mystery of the intervention? It will be personified as Ananke, goddess of inevitability, necessity, fate and destiny. The everlasting oneness was Ananke’s realm where she lay contentedly in her undisturbed repose, like the veiled Isis of Sais.



"I am all that has been and is and shall be; and no one has ever lifted my garment.”



Ananke rests alone, untouched, unpenetrated, undefiled. Her’s the state of undifferentiated oneness and equilibrium, her’s the endless repeating cycle, her’s the infinite cosmos.


© John Dunn.

Before the Beginning

Friday, 6 October 2023 at 21:16

Gold or nothing?

Before the Beginning

Zero is nothing more than a mathematical convenience. It has, by its very nature, no real existence. We all accept what nothing is, but only if it is a qualified nothing.

There is nothing …in this box
There is nothing …in this room
There is nothing …between you and me
I searched for gold and found nothing.

In these instances, nothing is delimited by a qualification. We know there is oxygen, nitrogen and carbon dioxide in the box, but the qualification denotes the nothingness to be agreed upon. We know that the prospector might have dug up a pile of sand and dirt in the search for gold, but we know what nothing means because of the qualification. Nothing is actually nothing plus qualifier.

Can there be nothing without qualification? Can there be unbounded nothingness, or infinite nothingness? Let us suppose the answer is yes; there can be unbounded nothingness. However, would not that state, that everlasting equilibrium, be a single nothingness, an all-embracing oneness? We have the paradox of one equaling nothing.

You might say that before the Beginning there was not nothing; but rather there was one.

© John Dunn.