Next Entry
The authentic way
Sunday, 27 October 2024 at 22:13
The authentic way
And it is here that the authentic way, i.e. that which comes from the inner core of our being, is associated with or even called the Father. The words Love and Father are not bandied around because they make silly shallow people feel a warm glow inside. Rather, these precisely selected words hold deeply serious philosophical and eternal truths, which makes their translation in John’s Gospel and, more importantly, the understanding of them so vitally important. In the words Love and Father we recover that which Coleridge believed Spinoza had destroyed, namely a‘moral, intellectual, existential and personal Godhead’. There is something in the word ‘personal’ which is individual and human, but Coleridge was right to stress the word in its connection with God.
From Child of Encounter
© John Dunn.
|
Authenticity the impossible path
Saturday, 26 October 2024 at 22:11
Martin Heidegger
Authenticity the impossible path
Jesus is presented by John as the Saviour of the inner core of the individual. He saves us from simply getting by in the world in an inauthentic way. This was the point made by Rudolf Bultmann, taking his lead from the existentialists Kierkegaard and Heidegger. It is one thing to obey the Law, it is another to respond to a situation authentically.It is the latter course which offers the hardest path to follow, indeed the impossible path. You might obey the Law, but you will sin nevertheless, because we are all driven by externalities, i.e. the world, in the actions we take and even in our very thoughts.
From Child of Encounter
© John Dunn.
|
This inner core
Thursday, 24 October 2024 at 21:58
This inner core
But what is this love? Some insist repeatedly that it is derived from agape, but this has nothing to do with love; it is ‘do-gooding’ or charity which was the word in the Bible where the meaning of love was lost in translation. Love is internalised. It comes from the inner core of man. It comes from the God within. Define it? It cannot be defined. Here lies the mystery. If you are looking for mystery in your life, then here it is. There are no criteria by which love can be defined. It is this inner core of the individual that Jesus saves.
From Child of Encounter
© John Dunn.
|
The authentic moment
Wednesday, 23 October 2024 at 22:09
The authentic moment
I am aware that in this idea of trumping God, or building God, I am in danger of succumbing to a polarity of thinking. Deification of the human may be the opposite pole to Spinoza’s Absolute Substance, but it is polarity nevertheless and thus Spinozist. In order to escape this trap let us reassess some of the recently introduced themes and then ask - where do these themes come together? First of all the themes:
• To remain distinct from God
• To pursue Evola’s point and trump God by somehow internalising Him
• The freedom to choose
• The need for creativity and constant renewal
• The love encounter - the authentic moment when nothing else matters
The themes come together in John’s Gospel and the reconfiguring words of Jesus of Nazareth. Reconfiguring because Jesus confronted the Jews with a cosmological understanding that overturned old certainties. This rebirth of consciousness was centred on the love encounter and this love encounter is dependent upon the inner core of humanness. It is not dependent on law, be it natural necessity or man-made such as Marxian historical necessity, which is to be subject to externalities.
From Child of Encounter
© John Dunn.
|
Creation is always
Tuesday, 22 October 2024 at 21:51
Samuel Taylor Coleridge
Creation is always
The chance encounter, love, has no pre-existence. God is love and love is God, but there is no need for the God metaphor in the sense of needing to define an object as pre-existing knowledge. To define God in such a naive way is nothing short of idolatry. Creation is always now. Gentile recognised this. Nothing pre-exists creation. Nothing begets the creator. Coleridge thought that those individuals who acted at the creative level of the ‘secondary imagination’ attained a God- like power.
From Child of Encounter
© John Dunn.
|
Becoming more conscious
Monday, 21 October 2024 at 22:22
Samuel Taylor Coleridge
Becoming more conscious
I would not say that in trying to become divine we search within ourselves for the Nietzschean superman. We have already emphasised the need to be more human, not super- human, or Übermensch (beyond-man). We become more divine by becoming more conscious, more human. By Coleridge’s definition, we exist through most of our lives in a dead state - a sub-human state, i.e. not thinking or creating, but rather accepting the pre-existing. We live at the frozen pole, afraid to shoot the albatross. The implication is that there is an alternative, a resurrected state, a fully humanised state. The implication also is that we can know an object when the object is neither found nor discovered by our thought as existing before we began to know, i.e. we can truly create - and in Evola’s and Rilke’s terms this means creating God.
From Child of Encounter
© John Dunn.
|
As bees collect honey
Sunday, 20 October 2024 at 21:50
Rainer Maria Rilke
As bees collect honey
The only way to remain outside of God, distinct and separate from God, is to trump Spinoza by creating God, in effect, trumping God. In his 1925 work Essays on Magical Idealism, Julius Evola declared that ‘God does not exist. The Ego must create him by making itself divine’. The youthful Evola was onto something here. He was rejecting God as a presuppositional object of idolatry, locating the Divine instead in the mind of man. I sense too that this was something Rainer Maria Rilke was expressing in his Letters to a Young Poet when he wrote of God - ‘As bees collect honey together, so we fetch the sweetness out of everything and build Him’. Notably, Rilke added parenthetically to this ‘(so long as this comes about through love)’.
From Child of Encounter
© John Dunn.
|
Previous Entries
|
|