|
John Dunn
|
John Dunn home page
Schelling's romantic Spinozism
In naming freedom as the central struggle of tragedy, Schelling (left) identifies the core of individuality as that which is ‘unconditioned and absolute in his person’. The hero’s actions must originate from this unconditioned core and not be ‘an effect of nature or chance’.
Having established this in his Philosophy of Art, Schelling nevertheless wavers later in the same work by stating.
Necessity and freedom, in as much as they are universal concepts, must in art necessarily appear symbolically. Since only human nature is subjected to necessity on the one hand, yet capable of freedom on the other, both concepts must be symbolised in and through human nature, which itself must be represented by by individuals who - as just such natures in which freedom and necessity are bound to one another - are called persons.
Freedom and necessity are here bound to one another. Freedom cannot be bound, so where does this oxymoron originate? How can the individual’s unconditioned core be bound by anything?
Of freedom as tragedy, Schelling writes in The Philosophy of Art:
This is the most sublime idea and the greatest victory of freedom: voluntarily to bear the punishment for an unavoidable transgression in order to manifest his freedom precisely in the loss of that very same freedom, and to perish amid a declaration of free will.
This, as presented here as well as in my own Philosophical Letters on Dogmatism and Criticism, is the innermost spirit of the Greek tragedy. This is the basis for the reconciliation and harmony residing in that tragedy, the reason it does not devastate us, but rather leaves us feeling healed and, as Aristotle says, cleansed.
Freedom cannot exist as mere particularity. This is possible only insofar as it elevates itself to universality, and thus comes to an agreement with necessity concerning the consequences of guilt. Since it cannot avoid the unavoidable, it imposes the consequences on itself.
Key words here are:
- Unavoidable
- Reconciliation
- Harmony
- Healed
- Universality
This is the language of Oneness into which the individual is subsumed. This ultimately is where the ‘unconditioned and absolute’ core of the individual is surrendered. This is the suicide of the self.
Schelling ultimately is a Spinozist, i.e. holds a worldview best summed up by the Spinozist credo that freedom is the recognition of necessity.
In Schelling’s romantic Spinozism there is heroism in standing up to necessity, but there is tragedy in succumbing to the inevitable.
Quotes taken from F. W. J. Schelling The Philosopy of Art, trans. D. W. Stott, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 1989.
© John Dunn.
Click here for book sales
|
|
|
Heidegger under the carpet
Death for Heidegger sets the limit to separateness as a human being. In the end all is subsumed into the Oneness. In this context therefore, human life is a temporary aberration, something with which Heidegger reluctantly had to deal. Ironically, Heidegger had to deal with this because of the uniquely human ability to stand back and think about this aberration.
John Dunn
|
|
Quote every hour:
Real education must ultimately be limited to men who insist on knowing. The rest is mere sheep-herding. Ezra Pound
|
|
Rooting for Rosenzweig
Because the unity of the ‘All’ is projected as the future, the reader is called upon to realise that same unity in actuality. What Rosenzweig is actually calling upon the reader to do is commit the suicide of the self. In other words, exchange the sovereignty of independent thinking for subsumption into world unity.
John Dunn
|
|
|
|
|
|
You are visitor number 985811
|
|
|
|